Muslim Bludgeons, Strangles, Stabs, and Burns Girlfriend's Family
Father and Sister brutally murdered.
Mother beaten, burned, and left unconscious outside the family's blazing home.
Iftekhar Murtaza, a 22-year-old American Muslim man living in Southern California was arrested in Phoenix Airport for bludgeoning, stabbing, strangling, and burning Leela, Karishma, and Jayprakash Dhanak. These three victims were the mother, sister, and father of his girlfriend, Shayona Dhanak.
The siege against the Dhanak household begain late in the evening of May 21st. The Dhanak family home was set ablaze, and Leela Dhanak, the mother of Iftekhar Murtaza's former girlfriend, was found very badly beaten, burned, and unconscious in a yard outside the home. A few hours later, the bludgeoned, strangled, stabbed, and torched bodies of his sweetheart's sister, Karishma Dhanak, and her father, Jayprakash Dhanak, were found along a hiking trail about 20 miles from the Dhanak home. The coroners were able to get a fingerprint from the female corpse and match the teeth from the male corpse to dental records to confirm their identities. The younger sister and object of Murtaza's affections, Shayona Dhanak, was in her dorm at U.C. Irvine when Iftekhar paid a visit to the Dhanak house.
When Iftekhar Murtaza was arrested, he was waiting to board a flight to Bangladesh, a perfect country for someone like Iftekhar Murtaza. Bangladesh was carved out of India to provide a homeland for Muslims unwilling to tolerate living with Hindus, and who were also not able to get along with their fellow Muslims in Pakistan. Bangladesh serves as a perfect example of how Islam destroys a society. It has experienced a non-stop decline in its economy since its Islamization, and has one of the lowest standards of living in the world. Yet, it sits in stark contrast to the countries that surround it. India and China have achieved exponential increases in their GDP and the global investment community expects them to dominate the world's economic growth in the years to come.
Authorities had previously detained Iftekhar for questioning, but let him go after he denied ever being in Anaheim the night of the attack. His excuse for attempting to leave the country to go to Bangladesh is that he was simply going to visit relatives. The timimg of the trip and the fact that authorities have stated that Iftekhar Murtaza's cell phone was used within 2 miles of the Dhanak home 50 minutes before Murtaza's jihad is thought to have begun, show that he may be pulling a Muhammad/Allah: Bukhari:V7B67N427 "The Prophet said, ‘If I take an oath and later find something else better than that, then I do what is better and expiate my oath.'", Qur'an 9:3 "Allah and His Messenger dissolve obligations.", Qur'an 66:2 "Allah has already sanctioned for you the dissolution of your vows.", Bukhari:V4B52N268 "Allah's Apostle said, ‘War is deceit.'", Ishaq:519 "Having got Muhammad's permission, he said, ‘I must tell lies.' The Apostle said, ‘Tell them.'", Ishaq:323 "I am the best of plotters. I deceived them with My guile so that I delivered you from them.", Ishaq:442 "By Muhammad's order we beguiled them.".
His lack of interest in brazenly taking credit for his deeds is interesting. It shows the influence that living in the United States has had on Iftekhar. Muslims in Islamic countries have little to live for and know that the Sharia (Islamic) Law upon which their society is run, by definition supports all Islam-sanctioned events like killing infidels and dealing with unruly women. This is because Islam not only condones these and other immoral actions, but Allah insists upon them: Qur'an 2:191 "And kill them wherever you find and catch them. Drive them out from where they have turned you out; for Al-Fitnah (polytheism, disbelief, oppression) is worse than slaughter.", Bukhari:V1B1N6 "Just issue orders to kill every Jew in the country.", Ishaq: 676 "‘You obey a stranger who encourages you to murder for booty. You are greedy men. Is there no honor among you?' Upon hearing those lines Muhammad said, ‘Will no one rid me of this woman?' Umayr, a zealous Muslim, decided to execute the Prophet's wishes. That very night he crept into the writer's home while she lay sleeping surrounded by her young children. There was one at her breast. Umayr removed the suckling babe and then plunged his sword into the poet. The next morning in the mosque, Muhammad, who was aware of the assassination, said, ‘You have helped Allah and His Apostle.' Umayr said. ‘She had five sons; should I feel guilty?' ‘No,' the Prophet answered. ‘Killing her was as meaningless as two goats butting heads.'", Tabari IX:76 "Malik has reported to me that you were the first from Himyar to embrace Islam and that you have killed infidels, so rejoice at your good fortune."
Additionally, there aren't many freedoms afforded Muslims in these countries, so there is not much left for them to lose. Iftekhar Murtaza, accustomed to life in the United States, had a lot to lose. Unfortunately for Iftekhar, and of course for the Dhanaks, Islam trumped being an American on May 21st.
The Hindu Dhanaks had recently told Shayona that they did not want her to see the Muslim anymore, and their concerns about the suitability of their daughter's suitor were obviously well-founded. A conclusion that is strikingly obvious, yet one you will not see in any report of this incident produced by the mainstream media.
As we read articles and watched reports on this story, we noticed that every reporter focused on the conservative nature of the particular sect of Hinduism the Dhanak family followed. Each writer or reporter talked of how intolerant these Hindus are of their children dating prior to marriage or outside of their religion. Some reporters even detailed how strict they are about eating meat and watching TV, and even discussed the religion's unequal treatment of women (as if this was unique to Hinduism). Many of the articles also had much to say about how Jay Dhanak defrauded the US Postal Service.
What we didn't see in any of these articles (and we read and listened to over 20), was any discussions about Iftekhar. The only mention of the word "Muslim" was when it was used to make an implication as to the motivations behind the bigotry the Dhanaks were exhibiting when they told their daughter to stop seeing Iftekhar Murtaza. The word "Islam" did not appear in any of these stories - not one. By focusing entirely on the religion of the Dhanaks and bringing up the father's white-collar criminal activities, all without making even one reference to Islam, the media is creating a sentiment that the victims had in some way brought this evil upon themselves, because they were religious and intolerant. It's interesting to contemplate how the media would have written about this tragedy if Iftekhar Murtaza was a skinhead neo-Nazi and the Dhanaks were agnostics or atheists. If the Dhanaks were black, everyone in the U.S. would have heard about this story non-stop for the next few days. Triple that amount of media coverage if the Dhanaks were Mexican immigrants - legal or not - who were attacked by someone who was said to have made comments against or even simply had used the term "illegal aliens" at some time. If the Dhanaks were gay, the story would chew up every news cycle around the world for the next 3 weeks.
Since this is an obvious trend in the media, and it's ubiquitous, what are we supposed to make of it? To us, this is simply one more sign to add to the thousands of others that show us that the West cannot be saved. The only good that can come from sites like ProphetofDoom.net, that are willing to look for answers that are not watered down by political correctness, is that individuals can be saved. This statement is itself politically incorrect. No one wants to hear bad news. The West wants its ears tickled. They don't want to hear that their tolerance of evil and hate makes them as much to blame as the perpetrators of it.
Only those who are willing to reveal obvious truths at the expense of a loss in popularity and personal safety, will point out that these horrid acts, even in the extremely unlikely event they weren't perpetrated by Iftekhar Murtaza, are in no way "extreme" and are exactly what a good Muslim is expected to do. He had to deal with the insults from these infidels head on, and make sure that he upheld the edicts set for him by Allah and follow the example of the perfect Muslim laid out in Islam's tales of the prophet Muhammad: Ishaq:595 "The Apostle said, 'Get him away from me and cut off his tongue.'" , Ishaq:312 "Umar said to the Apostle, ‘Let me pull out Suhayl's two front teeth. That way his tongue will stick out and he will never be able to speak against you again.'" , Qur'an 8:12 "Your Lord inspired the angels with the message: ‘I will terrorize the unbelievers. Therefore smite them on their necks and every joint and incapacitate them. Strike off their heads and cut off each of their fingers and toes." , Tabari VII:133 / Ishaq:387 "When Muhammad saw Hamzah he said, ‘If Allah gives me victory over the Quraysh at any time, I shall mutilate thirty of their men!' When the Muslims saw the rage of the Prophet they said, ‘By Allah, if we are victorious over them, we shall mutilate them in a way which no Arab has ever mutilated anybody." , Bukhari:V4B52N44 "A man came to Allah's Apostle and said, ‘Instruct me as to such a deed as equals Jihad in reward.' He replied, ‘I do not find such a deed.'" , Muslim:C40B20N4676 "Jihad Is Compulsory." , Noble Qur'an:2:190 Footnote: "Jihad is holy fighting in Allah's Cause with full force of numbers and weaponry. It is given the utmost importance in Islam and is one of its pillars. By Jihad Islam is established, Allah's Word is made superior (which means only Allah has the right to be worshiped), and Islam is propagated. By abandoning Jihad Islam is destroyed and Muslims fall into an inferior position; their honor is lost, their lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish. Jihad is an obligatory duty in Islam on every Muslim. He who tries to escape from this duty, or does not fulfill this duty, dies as a hypocrite."
The authorities are telling the press that they believe more people were involved in the rampage. These "authorities" - the same ones who interviewed and released Iftekhar shortly after questioning him about the events that began on the evening of May 21, now claim that one person couldn't have done all of this by himself. Of course, they forget that Iftekhar Murtaza is not a person. He has had the moral compass that all people have when they are born removed. He was raised to be a Muslim. A Muslim who has lived up to the high expectations that come with the Murtaza name - a name which means "He with whom Allah is pleased."